[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 3/7] ddb: create new header file db_mp.h
|
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 3/7] ddb: create new header file db_mp.h |
|
Date: |
Sun, 24 Nov 2013 23:07:45 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Guillem Jover, le Fri 22 Nov 2013 19:10:57 +0100, a écrit :
> Is it really correct to add that copyright and license header when
> the stuff has just been moved? (The same for previous and subsequent
> similar patches.)
If the stuff was really copyrightable, yes. Here these are trivial
function interfaces, there is no copyright on such code.
Samuel
- [PATCH 1/7] ddb/db_mp.c: include kd.h for kdb_kintr(), Marin Ramesa, 2013/11/22
- [PATCH 2/7] ddb: move forward declarations into a header file, Marin Ramesa, 2013/11/22
- [PATCH 3/7] ddb: create new header file db_mp.h, Marin Ramesa, 2013/11/22
- [PATCH 4/7] ddb: move forward declaration into a header file, Marin Ramesa, 2013/11/22
- [PATCH 5/7] ddb: move forward declarations into a header file, Marin Ramesa, 2013/11/22
- [PATCH 6/7] ddb/db_examine.c: trivial stylistic fix for consistency, Marin Ramesa, 2013/11/22
- [PATCH 7/7] device: new header file chario.h, Marin Ramesa, 2013/11/22
- Re: [PATCH 1/7] ddb/db_mp.c: include kd.h for kdb_kintr(), Guillem Jover, 2013/11/22