[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH hurd 27/30] hurd: add intranpayload functions to all hurd typ
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH hurd 27/30] hurd: add intranpayload functions to all hurd types |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Dec 2014 01:54:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
David Michael, le Mon 08 Dec 2014 13:45:50 -0500, a écrit :
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Justus Winter
> <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
> > +#ifdef HURD_DEFAULT_PAYLOAD_TO_PORT
> > +#if HURD_DEFAULT_PAYLOAD_TO_PORT
> > +/* Any non-numeric value will fail this test. If 1 (or any number) is
> > + given, do not inject the default translator function. */
> > +#undef HURD_DEFAULT_PAYLOAD_TO_PORT
> > +#endif
> > +#else
> > + import <hurd/ports.h>;
> > +#define HURD_DEFAULT_PAYLOAD_TO_PORT ports_payload_get_name
> > +#endif
>
> My glibc builds are failing, and I think it's because of this
> inclusion of <hurd/ports.h> in hurd_types.defs.
>
> Anything that includes <hurd/signal.h> now gets <hurd/ports.h> (via
> the freshly output <hurd/msg.h>), which includes other files that
> require <hurd/signal.h>, but they aren't getting any of its
> definitions since _HURD_SIGNAL_H is already defined.
Ok, a classical inclusion loop issue.
> Do you have any suggestions to work around this?
I'd say just not include hurd/ports.h, and rather include it from the
users of defs.h. Yes, that sucks a bit, but it seems to me that other
solutions will bite use more.
Samuel