[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address/leak sanitizer, somebody?
|
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
|
Subject: |
Re: address/leak sanitizer, somebody? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 14 Apr 2015 18:16:22 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Samuel Thibault, le Tue 14 Apr 2015 18:05:51 +0200, a écrit :
> Thomas Schwinge, le Tue 14 Apr 2015 17:59:40 +0200, a écrit :
> > they have intimate knowledge about the operating system kernel
> > they're running on,
>
> But isn't this needed only for tsan?
More precisely, I see lsan only using internal__exit (only if exitcode
is defined, so it's not too bad not to have it), internal_snprintf and
internal_memset (already implemented), internal_sched_yield (trivial),
Samuel