[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep - check for reuse address
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep - check for reuse address |
Date: |
Sat, 9 Jan 2016 12:17:05 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Svante Signell, on Sat 09 Jan 2016 09:15:47 +0100, wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 00:37 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, on Fri 08 Jan 2016 21:59:56 +0100, wrote:
> > > Unlink the old socket and create a new one with the same name. (I
> > > wonder how GNU/Linux is implementing this?)
> >
> > It doesn't.
>
> Since it works on GNU/Linux how is it solved then?
No, it does not work. As I said in an earlier mail, GNU/Linux returns
zero as if it was successfull, but doesn't actually do anything about. A
very odd behavior, if you ask me.
Samuel
- GNUstep - check for reuse address, Riccardo Mottola, 2016/01/08
- Re: GNUstep - check for reuse address, Svante Signell, 2016/01/08
- Re: GNUstep - check for reuse address, Svante Signell, 2016/01/08
- Re: GNUstep - check for reuse address, Samuel Thibault, 2016/01/08
- Re: GNUstep - check for reuse address, Pino Toscano, 2016/01/08
- Re: GNUstep - check for reuse address, Samuel Thibault, 2016/01/08
- Re: GNUstep - check for reuse address, Svante Signell, 2016/01/08
- Re: GNUstep - check for reuse address, Samuel Thibault, 2016/01/08
- Re: GNUstep - check for reuse address, Svante Signell, 2016/01/09
- Re: GNUstep - check for reuse address,
Samuel Thibault <=
Re: GNUstep - check for reuse address, Samuel Thibault, 2016/01/08
Re: GNUstep - check for reuse address, Riccardo Mottola, 2016/01/08
Re: GNUstep - check for reuse address, Samuel Thibault, 2016/01/08