[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support
From: |
Svante Signell |
Subject: |
Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:29:56 +0100 |
On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 12:20 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 12:02 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > And with my old implementation it worked perfectly too.
> >
> > Because it was synchronous, which was posing other problems.
Yet the problem is if the implementation should be synchronous or asynchronous.
> Have you checked that all dbus/glib tests pass? I have not :(
Why did you edit this comment out? This could supply a user case answer to the
above question. Strict logic or not.
- Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Svante Signell, 2016/03/13
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Samuel Thibault, 2016/03/13
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Svante Signell, 2016/03/14
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Samuel Thibault, 2016/03/14
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Svante Signell, 2016/03/14
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Samuel Thibault, 2016/03/14
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Richard Braun, 2016/03/14
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Svante Signell, 2016/03/14
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Samuel Thibault, 2016/03/14
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Richard Braun, 2016/03/14
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support,
Svante Signell <=
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Samuel Thibault, 2016/03/14