[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks
|
From: |
Agustina Arzille |
|
Subject: |
Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks |
|
Date: |
Fri, 13 May 2016 01:03:40 -0300 |
Oops, I screwed up the robust low-level lock implementation. Here's an updated
patch with that fix.
I forgot to mention it in my previous message, but I left some global cthreads
types as they were, even though they could be replaced by plain integers now.
I'm not sure if anyone uses them directly, but they were exported, so they
remain unchanged.
glibc.diff
Description: Text Data
- [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks, Agustina Arzille, 2016/05/05
- Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks, Samuel Thibault, 2016/05/06
- Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks, Agustina Arzille, 2016/05/06
- Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks, Richard Braun, 2016/05/07
- Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks, Samuel Thibault, 2016/05/08
- Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks, Agustina Arzille, 2016/05/09
- Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks, Samuel Thibault, 2016/05/10
- Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks, Agustina Arzille, 2016/05/10
- Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks,
Agustina Arzille <=
Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo, 2016/05/09
Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks, Samuel Thibault, 2016/05/13