[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd on a cluster computer
From: |
Olaf Buddenhagen |
Subject: |
Re: Hurd on a cluster computer |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Jul 2016 03:33:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) |
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 01:42:16PM -1000, Brent W. Baccala wrote:
> I've been wondering about using Hurd on a cluster computer;
[...]
> If so, then the first step would be to modify Mach,
[...]
Pretty much everything you describe has actually been considered in the
original design of Mach, as it was meant to be the successor for certain
projects (Amoeba I think?) that were entirely about this topic.
However, as far as I can tell this has never been actually fully
implemented in Mach; and we dropped the remnants of the disfunctional
code for network IPC from our Mach variant several years ago.
While I'm not an expert on this, from what I have seen and heard, the
world has pretty much given up on this kind of transparent clustering,
as for pretty much all workloads that require such massive scaling for
performance / resource demands (large network servers, scientific
computing, render farms etc.), it's more effective and easier to manage
when partitioning the work explicitly using various kinds of specialised
protocols.
-antrik-
- Re: Hurd on a cluster computer,
Olaf Buddenhagen <=