[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BUG: /proc/self/exe reports relative paths, should always return abs
From: |
Svante Signell |
Subject: |
Re: BUG: /proc/self/exe reports relative paths, should always return absolute paths? |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Sep 2017 10:52:00 +0200 |
On Sat, 2017-09-09 at 22:04 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, on sam. 09 sept. 2017 10:51:36 +0200, wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 00:39 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > That goes back to file_exec_file_name provided with a relative path, and
> > > not
> > > an
> > > absolute path. That's where it needs fixing. I guess it could be a
> > > matter of making sysdeps/mach/hurd/execve.c call realpath(), as well as
> > > sysdeps/mach/hurd/spawni.c in the
> > > if ((xflags & SPAWN_XFLAGS_USE_PATH) == 0 || strchr (file, '/') != NULL)
> > > case.
> >
> > Sorry, but none of these changes had any effect. I built a new libc.so
> > including
> > print statements and run the programs with both LD_PRELOAD and
> > LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
> > No difference.
>
> Which programs do you run?
>
> execv/spawn are called from the parent, so the program that needs
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the parent of the program to be observed in
> /proc/pid/exe
Attached is a diff of the patch submitted-exec-filename.diff using realpath for
execve.c and spawni.c. The change of __execve fixes the /proc/self/exe problem.
What about freeing filename/file_name, using lstat instead of second argument of
realpath being NULL, declaring filename as const char* etc?
The second change of __spawni I did not find being effective. I added print
statements to all cases of the if then else construct, and nothing was printed
when running the test code with sh -c "..."
(some tab vs blank space differences might still be present)
submitted-exec_filename.diff.diff
Description: Text Data
- BUG: /proc/self/exe reports relative paths, should always return absolute paths?, Svante Signell, 2017/09/07
- Re: BUG: /proc/self/exe reports relative paths, should always return absolute paths?, Samuel Thibault, 2017/09/07
- Re: BUG: /proc/self/exe reports relative paths, should always return absolute paths?, Svante Signell, 2017/09/09
- Re: BUG: /proc/self/exe reports relative paths, should always return absolute paths?, Samuel Thibault, 2017/09/09
- Re: BUG: /proc/self/exe reports relative paths, should always return absolute paths?,
Svante Signell <=
- Re: BUG: /proc/self/exe reports relative paths, should always return absolute paths?, Svante Signell, 2017/09/14
- Re: BUG: /proc/self/exe reports relative paths, should always return absolute paths?, Samuel Thibault, 2017/09/14
- Re: BUG: /proc/self/exe reports relative paths, should always return absolute paths?, Svante Signell, 2017/09/15
- Re: BUG: /proc/self/exe reports relative paths, should always return absolute paths?, Samuel Thibault, 2017/09/15
- Re: BUG: /proc/self/exe reports relative paths, should always return absolute paths?, Svante Signell, 2017/09/15
- Re: BUG: /proc/self/exe reports relative paths, should always return absolute paths?, Samuel Thibault, 2017/09/17
- Re: BUG: /proc/self/exe reports relative paths, should always return absolute paths?, Svante Signell, 2017/09/18
- Re: BUG: /proc/self/exe reports relative paths, should always return absolute paths?, Samuel Thibault, 2017/09/18
- Re: BUG: /proc/self/exe reports relative paths, should always return absolute paths?, Samuel Thibault, 2017/09/18
- Re: BUG: /proc/self/exe reports relative paths, should always return absolute paths?, Svante Signell, 2017/09/20