[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by s
From: |
Svante Signell |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:39:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.30.4-1 |
On Thu, 2019-01-24 at 13:19 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le jeu. 24 janv. 2019 12:11:25 +0100, a ecrit:
> > I've built and installed glibc-2.28-5 with the patches in
> > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24110
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Good :) I'll commit the fix then.
>
> (I guess you tested that the same tests do fail with a non-patched
> glibc).
Of course.
You only committed the first patch,threadinit-set-SS_DISABLE.patch, not the
second, sigaltstack-set-SS_DISABLE.patch, from
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24110
Why?
My test build was based on both patches. Do you mean that the second patch is
not needed?
- [Bug hurd/24110] New: SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, bruno at clisp dot org, 2019/01/20
- [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, address@hidden, 2019/01/20
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/22
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Joshua Branson, 2019/01/23
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Svante Signell, 2019/01/23
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/23
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Svante Signell, 2019/01/24
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/24
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack,
Svante Signell <=
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/25
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/26
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Svante Signell, 2019/01/28
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/28
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Svante Signell, 2019/01/28
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/28
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Svante Signell, 2019/01/28
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/28
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Svante Signell, 2019/01/28
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Svante Signell, 2019/01/28