[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[RFC PATCH htl v2 0/4] Rewrite THREAD_GSCOPE
From: |
Sergey Bugaev |
Subject: |
[RFC PATCH htl v2 0/4] Rewrite THREAD_GSCOPE |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Aug 2021 18:26:32 +0300 |
Hello,
this is a revised version of the patchset I have sent a few months ago [0].
Sending to both bug-hurd and libc-alpha this time.
[0]: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2021-05/msg00063.html
The goal is to get rid of the excessive (and redundant) gsync_wake () calls.
The means are rewriting how THREAD_GSCOPE_* is implemented in HTL to work more
like its NPTL counterpart. To get this working, I first have to expose HTL's
internal thread table to ld.so, a lot like NPTL already does.
Before this patchset:
$ rpctrace uname |& grep -c gsync_wake
57
With this patchset (first 3 patches):
$ ./testrun.sh --tool=rpctrace /bin/uname |& grep -c gsync_wake
0
The unsolved question with this patchset is the fate of THREAD_GSCOPE_IN_TCB.
Apparently, when it was introduced in [1], it was indeed only used to
distinguish between cases where the GSCOPE flag is in TCB or not. But as of
now, it is used mostly as a generic way to conditionally compile either HTL-
or NPTL-specific code, mostly for TLS initialization. Now that all ports have
the GSCOPE flag in TCB, this definition no longer does what it says.
[1]:
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=a5df0318ef30a4dcff3fa2cb82265f641813d9ea
I can think of two ways this can be handled:
* Code can be rewritten and reorganized to use port-specific files instead of
conditional compilation. From looking at how glibc source is organized, this
appears to be the generally preferred way. I'm sending one more patch that
makes a (perhaps misguided) attempt to do this; but I'm not sure what would
be good way to handle the definitions in <ldsodefs.h> -- please take a look.
* A more conservative approach would be to leave the code using
THREAD_GSCOPE_IN_TCB as is for now, but change the variable's name to better
reflect what it's used for. I haven't really been able to come up with a good
name, though.
Alternatively, it could just be left as is for now.
Sergey Bugaev (4):
htl: Move thread table to ld.so
htl: Reimplement GSCOPE
testrun.sh: Add support for --tool=rpctrace
XXX: Attempt to get rid of most THREAD_GSCOPE_IN_TCB usages
Makefile | 9 +++-
elf/dl-reloc.c | 21 ---------
elf/dl-support.c | 15 ------
elf/dl-tls.c | 39 ---------------
htl/Versions | 2 -
htl/pt-alloc.c | 50 ++++++++------------
htl/pt-create.c | 11 ++---
htl/pt-internal.h | 23 +++------
sysdeps/generic/ldsodefs.h | 10 ++--
sysdeps/htl/dl-support.c | 28 +++++++++++
sysdeps/htl/dl-thread_gscope_wait.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++
sysdeps/htl/dl-tls.c | 39 +++++++++++++++
{elf => sysdeps/htl}/dl-tls_init_tp.c | 4 +-
sysdeps/htl/pt-key-delete.c | 8 ++--
sysdeps/htl/pthreadP.h | 2 -
sysdeps/htl/raise.c | 8 +++-
sysdeps/htl/thrd_current.c | 7 ++-
sysdeps/mach/hurd/htl/pt-sigstate-init.c | 2 +-
sysdeps/mach/hurd/htl/pt-sysdep.c | 2 +-
sysdeps/mach/hurd/htl/pt-sysdep.h | 2 +-
sysdeps/mach/hurd/i386/tls.h | 19 ++++++++
sysdeps/mach/hurd/tls.h | 20 +-------
sysdeps/nptl/dl-support.c | 26 ++++++++++
sysdeps/nptl/dl-tls.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/alpha/dl-support.c | 2 +-
25 files changed, 287 insertions(+), 170 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 sysdeps/htl/dl-support.c
create mode 100644 sysdeps/htl/dl-thread_gscope_wait.c
create mode 100644 sysdeps/htl/dl-tls.c
rename {elf => sysdeps/htl}/dl-tls_init_tp.c (93%)
create mode 100644 sysdeps/nptl/dl-support.c
create mode 100644 sysdeps/nptl/dl-tls.c
--
2.31.1
- [RFC PATCH htl v2 0/4] Rewrite THREAD_GSCOPE,
Sergey Bugaev <=
- [RFC PATCH htl v2 4/4] XXX: Attempt to get rid of most THREAD_GSCOPE_IN_TCB usages, Sergey Bugaev, 2021/08/30
- [RFC PATCH htl v2 2/4] htl: Reimplement GSCOPE, Sergey Bugaev, 2021/08/30
- [RFC PATCH htl v2 3/4] testrun.sh: Add support for --tool=rpctrace, Sergey Bugaev, 2021/08/30
- [RFC PATCH htl v2 1/4] htl: Move thread table to ld.so, Sergey Bugaev, 2021/08/30
- Re: [RFC PATCH htl v2 0/4] Rewrite THREAD_GSCOPE, Florian Weimer, 2021/08/30