[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] hurd: Implement device memory mapping
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] hurd: Implement device memory mapping |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Dec 2021 16:40:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) |
Joan Lledó, le dim. 19 déc. 2021 12:14:18 +0100, a ecrit:
> El 12/12/21 a les 16:19, Samuel Thibault ha escrit:
> >
> > Don't we need
> >
> > else { pager = wobj; } ?
> >
> > Otherwise pager would be undefined.
>
> In the case when the two previous conditions are false, what about robj? can
> we be sure it's null and not leaked?
No, the io_map call could return different ports if it wants so, see the
io_map documentation:
“
For objects where read data and write data are the same, these objects
will be equal, otherwise they will be disjoint.
”
Samuel
- Re: About consuming/releaseing ports in libpciaccess, Joan Lledó, 2021/12/12
- [PATCH] hurd: Implement device memory mapping, Joan Lledó, 2021/12/12
- Re: [PATCH] hurd: Implement device memory mapping, Samuel Thibault, 2021/12/12
- Re: [PATCH] hurd: Implement device memory mapping, Joan Lledó, 2021/12/19
- Re: [PATCH] hurd: Implement device memory mapping,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: [PATCH] hurd: Implement device memory mapping, Joan Lledó, 2021/12/28
- Re: [PATCH] hurd: Implement device memory mapping, Samuel Thibault, 2021/12/28
- Re: [PATCH] hurd: Implement device memory mapping, Joan Lledó, 2021/12/28
- Re: [PATCH] hurd: Implement device memory mapping, Samuel Thibault, 2021/12/28
- Re: [PATCH] hurd: Implement device memory mapping, Joan Lledó, 2021/12/30
- [PATCH] hurd: Implement device memory mapping, Joan Lledó, 2021/12/30