[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: [PATCH 0/3] Rumpkernel in GNU Guix
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: [PATCH 0/3] Rumpkernel in GNU Guix |
Date: |
Tue, 16 May 2023 15:30:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) |
Janneke Nieuwenhuizen, le mar. 16 mai 2023 14:04:38 +0200, a ecrit:
> variants, but in the Guix build only ext2fs.static got built. As I
> couldn't find any reference to how building ex2fs.static was triggered,
> I ignored it...
>
> Also, until recently Guix simply used /hurd/ext2fs, but that failed on
> some machines
>
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/58320
That bug report was rather about exec.
> so it was --kind of reluctantly-- changed. It would be good to know
> we're simply supposed to use ext2fs.static.
Concerning ext2fs it *has* to be static, since dynamic load requires
being able to read files :)
> Thanks to your remark I now found
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/hurd-team/hurd/-/blob/master/debian/rules#L32
>
> and by adding
>
> --enable-static-progs=ext2fs,iso9660fs,rumpdisk,pci-arbiter,acpi
>
> to our package the .STATIC variants got nicely built and I used them for
> our grub.cfg.
Rumpdisk was relatively experimental so I hadn't enabled the static
builds by default upstream indeed. Now I have :)
Samuel