[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH gnumach] smp: Create AP processor set and put all APs inside
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH gnumach] smp: Create AP processor set and put all APs inside it |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Feb 2024 11:55:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) |
Almudena Garcia, le dim. 11 févr. 2024 10:48:23 +0000, a ecrit:
> I don't understand which is the objective of this. In an SMP system, all
> processor are equal in the scheduler. Why do you add this difference?
That's what we had already discussed at the time you introduced
the initial SMP code: there ought to be races in various parts of
translators etc. So for a first, better keep all translators etc. on the
BSP and only progressively try to put stuff on the APs.
Samuel
> El domingo 11 de febrero de 2024, Damien Zammit escribió:
> > This has the effect of running with one cpu only with smp,
> > but has the ability to enable APs in userspace with the right
> > processor set RPCs.
> > ---
> > ddb/db_print.c | 4 +++-
> > kern/machine.c | 7 ++++++-
> > kern/processor.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > kern/processor.h | 1 +
> > 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/ddb/db_print.c b/ddb/db_print.c
> > index 028cb887..b5b562fd 100644
> > --- a/ddb/db_print.c
> > +++ b/ddb/db_print.c
> > @@ -347,8 +347,10 @@ db_show_all_runqs(
> > {
> > int i;
> >
> > - db_printf("Processor set runq:\t");
> > + db_printf("Processor set def runq:\t");
> > showrq(&default_pset.runq);
> > + db_printf("Processor set APs runq:\t");
> > + showrq(&ap_pset->runq);
> > for (i = 0; i < smp_get_numcpus(); i++) {
> > db_printf("Processor #%d runq:\t", i);
> > showrq(&cpu_to_processor(i)->runq);
> > diff --git a/kern/machine.c b/kern/machine.c
> > index 87fbc4d1..9fbc3871 100644
> > --- a/kern/machine.c
> > +++ b/kern/machine.c
> > @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ void cpu_up(int cpu)
> >
> > processor = cpu_to_processor(cpu);
> > pset_lock(&default_pset);
> > + pset_lock(ap_pset);
> > s = splsched();
> > processor_lock(processor);
> > #if NCPUS > 1
> > @@ -92,10 +93,14 @@ void cpu_up(int cpu)
> > ms = &machine_slot[cpu];
> > ms->running = TRUE;
> > machine_info.avail_cpus++;
> > - pset_add_processor(&default_pset, processor);
> > + if (cpu == 0)
> > + pset_add_processor(&default_pset, processor);
> > + else
> > + pset_add_processor(ap_pset, processor);
> > processor->state = PROCESSOR_RUNNING;
> > processor_unlock(processor);
> > splx(s);
> > + pset_unlock(ap_pset);
> > pset_unlock(&default_pset);
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/kern/processor.c b/kern/processor.c
> > index 76735381..d151f497 100644
> > --- a/kern/processor.c
> > +++ b/kern/processor.c
> > @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ struct kmem_cache pset_cache;
> > int master_cpu;
> >
> > struct processor_set default_pset;
> > +struct processor_set *ap_pset;
> >
> > queue_head_t all_psets;
> > int all_psets_count;
> > @@ -67,16 +68,13 @@ def_simple_lock_data(, all_psets_lock);
> >
> > processor_t master_processor;
> >
> > -/*
> > - * Bootstrap the processor/pset system so the scheduler can run.
> > - */
> > -void pset_sys_bootstrap(void)
> > +static void pset_sys_bootstrap_real(struct processor_set *pset, int start,
> > int count)
> > {
> > int i;
> >
> > - pset_init(&default_pset);
> > - default_pset.empty = FALSE;
> > - for (i = 0; i < NCPUS; i++) {
> > + pset_init(pset);
> > + pset->empty = FALSE;
> > + for (i = start; i < start + count; i++) {
> > /*
> > * Initialize processor data structures.
> > * Note that cpu_to_processor is processor_ptr.
> > @@ -86,10 +84,10 @@ void pset_sys_bootstrap(void)
> > master_processor = cpu_to_processor(master_cpu);
> > queue_init(&all_psets);
> > simple_lock_init(&all_psets_lock);
> > - queue_enter(&all_psets, &default_pset, processor_set_t, all_psets);
> > - all_psets_count = 1;
> > - default_pset.active = TRUE;
> > - default_pset.empty = FALSE;
> > + queue_enter(&all_psets, pset, processor_set_t, all_psets);
> > + all_psets_count++;
> > + pset->active = TRUE;
> > + pset->empty = FALSE;
> >
> > /*
> > * Note: the default_pset has a max_priority of BASEPRI_USER.
> > @@ -97,6 +95,14 @@ void pset_sys_bootstrap(void)
> > */
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Bootstrap the processor/pset system so the scheduler can run.
> > + */
> > +void pset_sys_bootstrap(void)
> > +{
> > + pset_sys_bootstrap_real(&default_pset, 0, NCPUS);
> > +}
> > +
> > #if MACH_HOST
> > /*
> > * Rest of pset system initializations.
> > @@ -124,6 +130,8 @@ void pset_sys_init(void)
> > ipc_processor_init(processor);
> > }
> > }
> > +
> > + processor_set_create(&realhost, &ap_pset, &ap_pset);
> > }
> > #endif /* MACH_HOST */
> >
> > diff --git a/kern/processor.h b/kern/processor.h
> > index fc204ffa..29abc99a 100644
> > --- a/kern/processor.h
> > +++ b/kern/processor.h
> > @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ struct processor_set {
> > long sched_load; /* load avg for scheduler */
> > };
> > extern struct processor_set default_pset;
> > +extern struct processor_set *ap_pset;
> >
> > struct processor {
> > struct run_queue runq; /* local runq for this processor */
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Enviado desde mi dispositivo Sailfish
--
Samuel
---
Pour une évaluation indépendante, transparente et rigoureuse !
Je soutiens la Commission d'Évaluation de l'Inria.
- [PATCH gnumach] smp: Create AP processor set and put all APs inside it, Damien Zammit, 2024/02/11
- Re: [PATCH gnumach] smp: Create AP processor set and put all APs inside it, Almudena Garcia, 2024/02/11
- Re: [PATCH gnumach] smp: Create AP processor set and put all APs inside it,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: [PATCH gnumach] smp: Create AP processor set and put all APs inside it, Almudena Garcia, 2024/02/11
- Re: [PATCH gnumach] smp: Create AP processor set and put all APs inside it, Samuel Thibault, 2024/02/11
- Re: [PATCH gnumach] smp: Create AP processor set and put all APs inside it, Samuel Thibault, 2024/02/11
- Re: [PATCH gnumach] smp: Create AP processor set and put all APs inside it, Almudena Garcia, 2024/02/11
- Re: [PATCH gnumach] smp: Create AP processor set and put all APs inside it, Samuel Thibault, 2024/02/11
- Re: [PATCH gnumach] smp: Create AP processor set and put all APs inside it, Samuel Thibault, 2024/02/11
Re: [PATCH gnumach] smp: Create AP processor set and put all APs inside it, Samuel Thibault, 2024/02/11