[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH v2 gnumach] fpu: Fix for cpus that have no fxsave instruction
From: |
Damien Zammit |
Subject: |
[PATCH v2 gnumach] fpu: Fix for cpus that have no fxsave instruction |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Dec 2024 07:49:41 +0000 |
Fallthrough was incorrectly using fxsave() instead of
xsave() or xsaveopt().
TESTED: on AMD fam15h: no longer throws "No coprocessor" exception.
---
i386/i386/fpu.c | 18 +-----------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/i386/i386/fpu.c b/i386/i386/fpu.c
index 3d146f71..5bbad541 100644
--- a/i386/i386/fpu.c
+++ b/i386/i386/fpu.c
@@ -278,24 +278,8 @@ fpu_module_init(void)
/* Get default state from CPU. */
clear_ts();
fninit();
- switch (fp_save_kind) {
- case FP_XSAVEC:
- case FP_XSAVES:
- /* XRSTORS requires compact format, a bit faster anyway */
- fp_default_state->xfp_save_state.header.xcomp_bv =
XSAVE_XCOMP_BV_COMPACT;
- /* Fallthrough */
- case FP_XSAVE:
- case FP_XSAVEOPT:
- case FP_FXSAVE:
- fxsave(&fp_default_state->xfp_save_state);
- break;
- case FP_FNSAVE:
- fnsave(&fp_default_state->fp_save_state);
- break;
- }
+ fpu_save(fp_default_state);
set_ts();
-
- fp_default_state->fp_valid = TRUE;
}
/*
--
2.45.2
- [PATCH v2 gnumach] fpu: Fix for cpus that have no fxsave instruction,
Damien Zammit <=