[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hurd-amd64] ibus test failures
From: |
Diego Nieto Cid |
Subject: |
Re: [hurd-amd64] ibus test failures |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Dec 2024 20:32:47 +0000 |
On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 08:25:00PM +0000, Diego Nieto Cid wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 04:01:08PM +0000, Diego Nieto Cid wrote:
> >
> > Ok, I'll have a look in both OSes behaviour.
>
> There's something wrong with our CMSG_DATA macro. It produces the wrong
> output (or at least different from Linux).
>
> The attached program prints:
>
> cmsg: 0x101040a90; data: 0x101040a9c; hurd=0x101040a9c, linux=0x101040aa0
>
> data seems to be off by 4 bytes compared to linux output.
Adding the following line to the program:
printf("cmsghdr: %lu\n", sizeof (struct cmsghdr));
shows 12 on Hurd and 16 on Linux. I think I'm closer :)
- Re: [hurd-amd64] ibus test failures, (continued)
- Re: [hurd-amd64] ibus test failures, Samuel Thibault, 2024/12/29
- Re: [hurd-amd64] ibus test failures, Diego Nieto Cid, 2024/12/30
- Re: [hurd-amd64] ibus test failures, Diego Nieto Cid, 2024/12/30
- Re: [hurd-amd64] ibus test failures, Samuel Thibault, 2024/12/31
- Re: [hurd-amd64] ibus test failures, Samuel Thibault, 2024/12/31
- Re: [hurd-amd64] ibus test failures, Diego Nieto Cid, 2024/12/31
- Re: [hurd-amd64] ibus test failures, Diego Nieto Cid, 2024/12/31
- Re: [hurd-amd64] ibus test failures,
Diego Nieto Cid <=
- Re: [hurd-amd64] ibus test failures, Diego Nieto Cid, 2024/12/31
- Re: [hurd-amd64] ibus test failures, Diego Nieto Cid, 2024/12/31