[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Clients written in Guile.
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: Clients written in Guile. |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Nov 2002 14:44:50 +0100 |
Also, as you mentioned, requiring guile to be installed makes inetutils
unattractive for things like recovery disks.
Actually, I was more concerned about being forced to install guile to
use inetutils. But this is also a good point.
Did you have good reasons why we should consider it?
I don't have any good reasons whatsoever, this was mostly an general
inquiry. One reason might be that the clients might get easier to
maintain, or that messing with packets is easier in Guile (I haven't
explored this either of the reasons very far). Many maybes... Will
probably have to implement an client in both C and Guile with similar
functionality and see for my self.
Re: Clients written in Guile., Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/11/13