[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Clients written in Guile.
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: Clients written in Guile. |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:00:16 +0100 |
Envelope-to: address@hidden
X-Authentication-Warning: outpost.dnsalias.org: jbailey set sender to
address@hidden using -f
From: Jeff Bailey <address@hidden>
Cc: address@hidden
Date: 13 Nov 2002 08:53:27 -0500
X-UIDL: ecdb1be20fd108ca3fdd8247d749b774
--=-1Tr+xP86AUoJe4z2bNnU
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 08:44, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Did you have good reasons why we should consider it?
> I don't have any good reasons whatsoever, this was mostly an general
> inquiry. One reason might be that the clients might get easier to
> maintain, or that messing with packets is easier in Guile (I haven't
> explored this either of the reasons very far). Many maybes... Will
> probably have to implement an client in both C and Guile with similar
> functionality and see for my self.
The only case where we should be messing with packets directly is ping,
and I definitely want libicmp to stay a C library. There's a little bit
in FTP with setting up data channels, but even that is just analysing
data on the stream.
I was talking about clients like a DHCP client, where one has to send
some stuff, recive a bunch of other stuff etc...
- Clients written in Guile., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/11/13
- Re: Clients written in Guile., Jeff Bailey, 2002/11/13
- Re: Clients written in Guile., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/11/13
- Re: Clients written in Guile., Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/11/13
- Re: Clients written in Guile., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/11/13
- Re: Clients written in Guile., Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/11/13
- Re: Clients written in Guile., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/11/13
Re: Clients written in Guile., Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/11/13