Re: [bug-inetutils] Re: DNS SRV support (patch)

[Alfred M. Szmidt]

   > The only questionable part of the patch is the dlopen bit,
   > nothing else.  If you could fix that, and have your papers clear,
   > then it could be added unless there are some objections to the
   > code.

   I can't fix the dlopen part, because I'm unconvinced that it's
   broken.

This is just being chidlish.  It is broken by _design_; dlopen() for
this is stupid.  And don't give me things about "plugins" etc, this
isn't a plugin.

   Of course, anyone else who cares could change it.

Have you had your papers cleared with the FSF?