[Bug-kawa] [bugs #9158] defmacro & archive/files compilation broken if module-static is #f

[Per Bothner]

This mail is an automated notification from the bugs tracker
 of the project: Kawa.

/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #9158] Latest Modifications:

Changes by: 
                Per Bothner <address@hidden>
'Date: 
                Wed 06/09/2004 at 04:23 (GMT)

            What     | Removed                   | Added
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Resolution | None                      | Fixed
         Assigned to | None                      | bothner
              Status | Open                      | Closed


------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ----------------------------
I checked in a fix.






/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #9158] Full Item Snapshot:

URL: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=9158>
Project: Kawa
Submitted by: 0
On: Sun 05/30/2004 at 04:39

Category:  Scheme language
Severity:  5 - Average
Item Group:  Run-time exception
Resolution:  Fixed
Assigned to:  bothner
Status:  Closed


Summary:  defmacro & archive/files compilation broken if module-static is #f

Original Submission:  Macroexpansion causes a null pointer exception when 
loading 
some macros defined in an archive or via files compilation.

Examples of archive and files compilation are linked below:
<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/kawa/2004-q2/msg00075.html>
<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/kawa/2004-q2/msg00078.html>

Chris Dean discovered he could get the module example to work using 
(module-static #t):
<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/kawa/2004-q2/msg00082.html>

As I also got the module example to work with an older CVS version this appears 
to be a regression. I can pinpoint the regression to between 2004-05-04 and 
2004-05-17.

Regards,
Adam

Follow-up Comments
------------------


-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed 06/09/2004 at 04:23       By: bothner
I checked in a fix.












For detailed info, follow this link:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=9158>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/