Re: bogus handing of Linux shared libraries

[Philip Blundell]

>Except that it still changes the default behavior for unmatched
>platforms, but it shouldn't.

Why not?  Assuming that every future platform is going to be buggy seems to be 
a bit of a gloomy view of the world.  Wouldn't it be better to just flag the 
ones that you know will have problems?

>And it doesn't apply cleanly; the current sources have hppa* in the list 
>of platforms that support pass_all.

Strange, I'm looking at what I thought was the latest in CVS.

File: libtool.m4        Status: Locally Modified

   Working revision:    1.167
   Repository revision: 1.167   /cvsroot/libtool/libtool/libtool.m4,v
   Sticky Tag:          (none)
   Sticky Date:         (none)
   Sticky Options:      (none)

Is there some other place to get the development sources?

p.

pgpILkYEbzbq6.pgp
Description: PGP signature