bug-libtool
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: check for max cmd line length


From: Gary V . Vaughan
Subject: Re: check for max cmd line length
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 18:25:27 +0100

On Monday 25 June 2001  5:20 pm, Tim Van Holder wrote:
> > > Please don't check for this on the Hurd, (*-gnu*), but just set it
> > > to any maximum value you need.
> >
> > Hmm.. I can't decide if this is good news or not. ;)  I think what
> > needs to be done is to add some mechanism for telling Libtool
> > that there is no maximum.  That would involve a check for Hurd
> > and setting a flag in configury, then in the libtool script
> > checks that skip the piecewise linking if the flag is set.
>
> That, or you could just set some high default in AC_LIBTOOL_SYS_MAX_CMD_LEN
> (say, 256K, as it seems fairly unlikely that would be hit often) the
> same way a default is now set for DJGPP (where the test would otherwise
> blow up the system).

I deliberately fiddled Tim's patch for DJGPP with the hurd problem in mind... 
I was just waiting to find this thread again while working through the couple 
of hundred I have marked for attention before 1.4b is released.

However, I don't want to blindly patch libtool if it a) masks a bug elsewhere 
in libtool, b) masks a bug in the hurd.  

Marcus, making this change in libtool is now a no-brainer, but we'll await 
your verdict on whether this is the the Right Thing To Do, or whether it is a 
bug elsewhere that you are seeing before we do anything else.

Cheers,
        Gary.
-- 
  ())_.  Gary V. Vaughan     gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org)
  ( '/   Research Scientist  http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk        ,_())____
  / )=   GNU Hacker          http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool   \'      `&
`(_~)_   Tech' Author        http://sources.redhat.com/autobook    =`---d__/



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]