[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: triplet brackets
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: triplet brackets |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Sep 2002 01:51:17 +0200 |
address@hidden writes:
> On Friday 13 September 2002 11.34, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> > The default in Lilypond to add a triplet bracket as
> > soon as you don't have a beam with exactly the same
> > length as the triplet.
>
> I know, the question was whether this should be considered a good behaviour,
> or if it would be better to have a different default (for the todo). E.g., I
> can find no example of sane notes where it would be bad to have a rule like
> "make the brackets invisible iff the bracketed notes are all in the same
> beam", but I might be wrong.
Detecting all cases where the bracket is not needed is difficult. For
example
[c16 c \times 2/3 { c c c } c16]
I'd say it is not very clear which notes belong to the tuplet.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen