Re: bugs.ly

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

address@hidden writes:
> > The chord-naming scheme is consistent  with Ignatzek's book. If you
> > prefer another system, you're welcome to code support for it.
> >
> > Han-Wen
> > (Getting very tired of yet another chord name request)
> 
> I'm just curious: Does this book say that \chords c^3 and \chords c should be 
> typeset identically? (in that case i'll just do a dirty workaround in my 
> music).

c^3 is just a plain fifth. Since that doesn't have a traditional harmonic
function, I suppose it doesn't qualify as chord.

-- 

 Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden   |   http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen