Re: Bug with raggedbotton and raggedlastbotton

[Paul Scott]

Paul Scott wrote:

> Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
> > address@hidden writes:
> >  
> >
> > > From the names of the variables I would expect setting both of them 
> > > to true to give simple and minimal (old style) spacing (ragged 
> > > bottoms) and setting raggedbottom to false to try to fill the page 
> > > evenly (new smart style).
> > >   
> >
> >
> > that is true; apparently, for the cited example, the systems are just
> > a tad too large to fit on a single page.
> >  
> Here's an example (2.3.23) that should fit on one page but takes two.

This is extremely serious to me.  Lily 2.2.23 is only randomly useful to 
me since I don't know when the vertical spacing is going to be 
reasonable for any given project.  Is this not affecting anyone else?

Thanks,

Paul