Re: slurs clashing with portato marks (which are inverted!)

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

address@hidden writes:
> >
> >Isn't the idea that you can use c^.^- to get the dot below the
> >line and c^_ to get the dot above the line?
> >
> >    /Mats
> >
> Yes, that works (it also solves the slur clash problem).  But it's unclear 
> then what the "portato" mark is for.  I've never seen it used the way 
> lilypond draws it.

It's entirely possible that I've reversed the sign.  I'd be grateful
for someone to check in a good reference work, and apply the relevant
change in the MF sources (probably swapping a "u" and "d" for the
portato sign.)


> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> SEEK: Now with over 60,000 dream jobs! Click here:   
> http://ninemsn.seek.com.au?hotmail
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

-- 

 Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden   |   http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen