[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Em dashes not treated as punctuation
From: |
Mark Dewey |
Subject: |
Em dashes not treated as punctuation |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:38:57 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (Windows/20070716) |
I've noticed that em dashes aren't treated as punctuation, but rather as
letters (and thus part of the words).
I can see some reasons why this may have been overlooked, though:
1. Em dashes require special actions to type (and in LilyPond they would
probably be encoded as UTF-8 characters, though they are also in the extended
ASCII set).
2. In normal writing (outside of LilyPond) there are not spaces between em
dashes and the words surrounding them. (so, typing word1—word2 in a lyrics
context would treat it as a single word)
3. Not everyone is consciously aware of em dashes (although they are very
commonly used anyway).
Anyway, this is the character I mean: —
On a PC, create it by holding alt and typing 0151.
I don't know if they're really called em dashes, but I saw some website call
them that once.
Anyway, ideally, in a music notation program, there would be no space between
the em dash and the words around it. Sometimes, however, this may not be
practical, but in those cases it seems that unless the em dash is separating
off a segment ending the sentence, there should be equal space between the word
behind it and the word in front of it. If there is only one em dash in a
sentence, (or if it is separating off a segment to end the sentence) it seems
it should at least be placed tightly next to the left word, with the space
(this part alone is easy enough to do, if you don't mind the space after it).
Anyway, I haven't seen a way to make this how I've generally seen it done in
printed sheet music, in LilyPond, so far, but it would definitely make for a
more professional look.
Here are some example sentences with how it seems the em dashes should be
formatted:
1. I went to the store—so did she, at that.
(If the above couldn't be so tight, the ideal would be to have the space after
it: I went to the store— so did she, at that)
2. We were looking for a blue car—Susy wanted a black car—for the show.
(If the above couldn't be so tight, it seems the ideal would be to have equal
space around the em dashes: We were looking for a blue car — Susy wanted a
black car — for the show)
Also, no space between the dash and the left word if the right word is on
another line:
i.e. first word—
next word
Here are some examples of how it seems it shouldn't look:
I went to the store —so did she, at that.
I went to the store — so did she, at that.
We were looking for a blue car— Susy wanted a black car— for the show.
We were looking for a blue car —Susy wanted a black car —for the show.
We were looking for a blue car —Susy wanted a black car— for the show.
We were looking for a blue car— Susy wanted a black car —for the show.
etc.
Whatever the case, it looks much better (much more professional, and much more
like it looks in literature) having them as tight as possible, whenever
possible.
Right now, the only fix I know of seems to be to always add some spacing (which
is very difficult to make equal, as it must be done differently every time, and
this can shift when something else about the music does), unless there is only
one separating em dash.
But it should be noted that these are fixes, and probably not what should be
the end solution (especially for how often these things show up). Anyway, I
don't think Finale does this either (or any other computer notation program),
but it seems calculable enough to integrate without problems.
Maybe you want to talk to an expert on these dashes before taking my views on
what it seems they should and shouldn't look like to heart, though, but I'm
sure they'll at least agree that it is ideal to have them as tight as possible
on both sides. My views primarily come from what I've seen done in musical
printings (not from computer programs for notating music), and in printed
literature.
I don't know if you could (or would want to) actually make it so the character
itself was treated as punctuation. Maybe it would be better to have some
simple code to input one between two words (that way you perhaps wouldn't have
to deal with UTF-8 stuff so much, if that's a problem, and people who don't
know how to type them would only have to learn the code to input, rather than
the unicode stuff, or whatever). Anyway, either way is fine with me, if you do
it.
Anyway, thanks for letting me post, and do well, with whatever you do.
- Em dashes not treated as punctuation,
Mark Dewey <=