Re: regressions: version?

[Marc Mouries]

Even if the beam are separated, the notes remain sixteenth note 
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixteenth_note>. So why would one wants to 
separate the beams? Is it from an interpretation perspective?

-Marc

Stan Sanderson wrote:
> On Jun 17, 2008, at 10:50 AM, Valentin Villenave wrote:
>
> > 2008/6/17 Stan Sanderson <address@hidden>:
> > > regressions- lily 2.11.49-1 : version?
> > >
> > > current (first sentence): This document presents proofs for LilyPond
> > > 2.11.48.
> > >
> > > I do have 2.11.49-1 loaded!
> >
> > Maybe this would explain why the auto-beam-beaming-override.ly test
> > hasn't failed (see Issue 639)...
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Valentin
>
> hmm, the test in my copy of the docs (2.11.49-1, which claims to be 
> proofs for 2.11.48) does fail.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>  
>  
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> first from 2.11.49 regtests (error); second from 2.11.48 regtests 
> (correct)
>
> Regards,
>
> Stan
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>