[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unbeamed 128th note is also unflagged
From: |
Patrick McCarty |
Subject: |
Re: unbeamed 128th note is also unflagged |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:30:40 -0700 |
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Francisco Vila <address@hidden> wrote:
> 2009/3/16 David Bobroff <address@hidden>:
>> I'm getting this same problem on 2.12.2 with the PDF. I also get:
>>
>> warning: flag `d7' not found
>>
>> This is with version 2.12.2
>>
>> -David
>
> 'u7' is not found, either. Tested on a newly compiled 2.12.3 1967f949e3c.
That's strange that you are getting this error when compiling from
git. Are you sure you did a `make clean'? This should clear out
mf/out/*, and `make all' should rebuild the fonts.
Can you test on the latest master? The commit you mention is nearly a
month old.
As you can see, the new 2.13 doc NEWS page shows the correct example:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/topdocs/NEWS
-Patrick
- unbeamed 128th note is also unflagged, Mark Polesky, 2009/03/16
- Re: unbeamed 128th note is also unflagged, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/03/16
- Re: unbeamed 128th note is also unflagged, Francisco Vila, 2009/03/16
- Re: unbeamed 128th note is also unflagged, David Bobroff, 2009/03/16
- Re: unbeamed 128th note is also unflagged, Francisco Vila, 2009/03/16
- Re: unbeamed 128th note is also unflagged, Francisco Vila, 2009/03/16
- Re: unbeamed 128th note is also unflagged,
Patrick McCarty <=
- Re: unbeamed 128th note is also unflagged, Francisco Vila, 2009/03/17
- Re: unbeamed 128th note is also unflagged, Neil Puttock, 2009/03/17
Re: unbeamed 128th note is also unflagged, Mats Bengtsson, 2009/03/16