[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: automatic accidental style voice: too many written accidentals
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: automatic accidental style voice: too many written accidentals |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:40:45 +0100 |
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 2:16 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> Is it necessary to ask for bug report database updates? I filed several
> bug reports to this list which as far as I can tell mostly got ignored,
> to the degree where they did not only not get an answer, but also were
> not filed into the database.
Hi David,
I only see two bug reports from you that I haven't entered; one was on
Oct 4. (and was eventually addressed by Patrick) and another on Oct 19
(the bracket thingy).
I do remember not having dealt with the column-message-thingy-report
because it differed a bit from 'regular' LilyPond reports. (That
doesn't make it an irrelevant report, it just means I would have
required a little extra time to deal with it, which I didn't have.)
> It is demotivating to invest the work for boiling down a problem into a
> small example, write up a good description for it, mail it to the list
> and not even get it filed into the bug database, let alone deserve an
> answer.
As I told Graham on -user, I am pretty sure I have never lost a single
report in the past couple of years. Bug reports are never "ignored",
even though it may take (quite) some time to file them. Do feel free
to send a report update if a particular issue is important to you; it
may encourage me to add it more quickly into the tracker, but
unfortunately it may not imply that developers will address it any
sooner.
Regards,
Valentin
- Re: automatic accidental style voice: too many written accidentals, (continued)
- Re: automatic accidental style voice: too many written accidentals, Frédéric Bron, 2009/10/20
- Re: automatic accidental style voice: too many written accidentals, Neil Puttock, 2009/10/22
- Re: automatic accidental style voice: too many written accidentals, Frédéric Bron, 2009/10/24
- Re: automatic accidental style voice: too many written accidentals, Valentin Villenave, 2009/10/25
- Re: automatic accidental style voice: too many written accidentals, David Kastrup, 2009/10/25
- Re: automatic accidental style voice: too many written accidentals, Graham Percival, 2009/10/25
- Re: automatic accidental style voice: too many written accidentals, David Kastrup, 2009/10/26
- Re: automatic accidental style voice: too many written accidentals, Graham Percival, 2009/10/26
- Re: automatic accidental style voice: too many written accidentals, David Kastrup, 2009/10/26
- Re: automatic accidental style voice: too many written accidentals, Graham Percival, 2009/10/26
- Re: automatic accidental style voice: too many written accidentals,
Valentin Villenave <=
- Re: automatic accidental style voice: too many written accidentals, Frédéric Bron, 2009/10/25
- Re: automatic accidental style voice: too many written accidentals, Trevor Daniels, 2009/10/25
- Re: [spam probable] Re: automatic accidental style voice: too many written accidentals, Frédéric Bron, 2009/10/26
- Re: automatic accidental style voice: too many written accidentals, Trevor Daniels, 2009/10/26
- Re: automatic accidental style voice: too many written accidentals, Mats Bengtsson, 2009/10/26
- Re: automatic accidental style voice: too many written accidentals, Frédéric Bron, 2009/10/29
- Re: automatic accidental style voice: too many written accidentals, David Kastrup, 2009/10/29
- Re: automatic accidental style voice: too many written accidentals, Frédéric Bron, 2009/10/29
- Re: automatic accidental style voice: too many written accidentals, Neil Puttock, 2009/10/25
- Re: automatic accidental style voice: too many written accidentals, Frédéric Bron, 2009/10/26