Re: x-ref intranslated docs

[Jean-Charles Malahieude]

Le 05/01/2011 03:59, Graham Percival disait :
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 10:06:16PM +0100, Jean-Charles Malahieude
> wrote:
> > I fully translated running.itely (part of usage), which contains
> > unnumbered sectioning. I then translated input.itely (part of
> > notation), where there is a link to a node which is an
> > unmberedsubsec in running (Invoking lilypond).
>
> Unnumbered sectioning is nothing new; we use it all the time in
> Notation.

As long as you link to the same manual, there is no problem.

> I believe the problem is an @unnumberedsubsec without having a @node
> in front of it; this is forbidden by our doc policy.  This does not
> appear in the english version of running.itely, but I *do* see one of
> these in the french version of running.itely.

Sorry to contradict you:
there is *no*  @unnumberedsubsec without having a @node in front of it
in the French version of running.itely, otherwise the link wouldn't even
exist neither be effective in notation-big-page.fr.html as I just 
checked on a fresh build.
The only sectionning that appears without a @node _also in English_ is
"@unnumberedsubsubsec Standard shell commands".


Cheers,
Jean-Charles