[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unnecessary accidental after tied note at the beginning of a new sys
|
From: |
Keith OHara |
|
Subject: |
Re: Unnecessary accidental after tied note at the beginning of a new system |
|
Date: |
Mon, 7 Mar 2011 04:03:24 +0000 (UTC) |
|
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Neil Puttock <n.puttock <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> On 6 March 2011 16:34, Zoltan Selyem <sese <at> elte.hu> wrote:
> >
> > % Hello,
> > %
> > % Accidentals on tied notes are printed at the beginning of a new
> > % system. But I think that in these cases there should be no second
> > % accidental in that measure.
>
> I agree.[...]
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=649
>
> Cheers,
> Neil
>
Stone, p55, agrees with Neil and Zoltan,
in that Kurt Stone says the accidental "need not be repeated" if it follows the
same repeated accidental due to a tie being broken across lines.