[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue 1702 in lilypond: Unaesthetic beam slope
From: |
lilypond |
Subject: |
Issue 1702 in lilypond: Unaesthetic beam slope |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:06:14 +0000 |
Status: Accepted
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Critical Regression
New issue 1702 by address@hidden: Unaesthetic beam slope
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1702
Reported by Xavier Scheuer
The following code gives an unaesthetic beam slope with 2.14 (2.15)
whereas the result was good with 2.12 (see attachments). (PH note - the
beam also collides with the accidental).
2.14.1 (2.15.2) gives the following warning:
warning: no viable initial configuration found: may not find good
beam slope
\score {
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff = "up" {
\relative c' {
\stemDown cis8*2/3 \change Staff = "down" \stemUp fis, ais b cis d
\change Staff = "up" \stemDown e
\change Staff = "down" \stemUp eis fis
\change Staff = "up" \stemDown d' e cis
}
}
\new Staff = "down" {
\clef bass
s1
}
>>
}
Attachments:
cross-staff-beam-2.12.png 5.1 KB
cross-staff-beam-2.14.png 5.0 KB
- Issue 1702 in lilypond: Unaesthetic beam slope,
lilypond <=
- Re: Issue 1702 in lilypond: Unaesthetic beam slope, lilypond, 2011/06/19
- Re: Issue 1702 in lilypond: Unaesthetic beam slope, lilypond, 2011/06/19
- Re: Issue 1702 in lilypond: Unaesthetic beam slope, lilypond, 2011/06/20
- Re: Issue 1702 in lilypond: Unaesthetic beam slope, lilypond, 2011/06/20
- Re: Issue 1702 in lilypond: Unaesthetic beam slope, lilypond, 2011/06/20