Re: 2.14.2

[Graham Percival]

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 06:53:45AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 7/14/11 6:23 AM, "Urs Liska" <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > ATM there are many issues to verify that are marked as fixed_2_14_2. So
> > before this version is released the issues can't be verified.
> 
> I think that in the past we have marked it as verified when fixed in the
> development version, and not waited for the backported version to be
> released.  But I think the policy you are proposing is better.
> 
> Perhaps when it's verified in one of the versions, a tag indicating that
> should be added:  verified_2_15_5.  Then when it's been verified in both
> versions, the verified_2_15_5 tag is removed, and status is set to Verified.

ick.  That means that they're floating around in the "issues to
verify" list, thereby confusing things for development.

Cheers,
- Graham