[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue 2228 in lilypond: Some users prefer to minimize partial beams
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Issue 2228 in lilypond: Some users prefer to minimize partial beams rather than beam by the beat |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:05:18 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 03:55:26PM +0000, address@hidden wrote:
> New patch set after:
>
> scripts/auxiliar/makeslr.py
> git add Documentation/snippets/new/strict-beat-beaming.ly
> git commit Documentation/snippets/new/strict-beat-beaming.ly
> git reset --hard HEAD
>
> This properly updated strict-beat-beaming.ly, but avoids showing all
> of the other snippets changed by convert-ly. Maybe we should add
> this to the CG.
The proper thing is to:
- make a branch
- do a local lsr update
- make your code and doc change
- do a local lsr update
- review, then merge with staging as a single commit or a special
"merge commit" which git-rebase will handly properly; consult
David about what that means in exact git terms.
I personally would just squash the branch into a single commit,
but a "separate branch merge" would be more appropriate for larger
changes.
- Graham
- Re: Issue 2228 in lilypond: Some users prefer to minimize partial beams rather than beam by the beat, lilypond, 2012/01/18
- Message not available
- Re: Issue 2228 in lilypond: Some users prefer to minimize partial beams rather than beam by the beat, lilypond, 2012/01/18
- Message not available
- Re: Issue 2228 in lilypond: Some users prefer to minimize partial beams rather than beam by the beat, lilypond, 2012/01/18
- Message not available
- Re: Issue 2228 in lilypond: Some users prefer to minimize partial beams rather than beam by the beat, lilypond, 2012/01/19
- Message not available
- Re: Issue 2228 in lilypond: Some users prefer to minimize partial beams rather than beam by the beat, lilypond, 2012/01/19
- Message not available
- Re: Issue 2228 in lilypond: Some users prefer to minimize partial beams rather than beam by the beat, lilypond, 2012/01/19
- Re: Issue 2228 in lilypond: Some users prefer to minimize partial beams rather than beam by the beat,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: Issue 2228 in lilypond: Some users prefer to minimize partial beams rather than beam by the beat, Carl Sorensen, 2012/01/19
- Re: Issue 2228 in lilypond: Some users prefer to minimize partial beams rather than beam by the beat, Graham Percival, 2012/01/21
- Message not available
- Re: Issue 2228 in lilypond: Some users prefer to minimize partial beams rather than beam by the beat, lilypond, 2012/01/19