[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Two possible bugs when dealing with Automatic note splitting
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Two possible bugs when dealing with Automatic note splitting |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Oct 2013 19:12:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> Gilberto Agostinho <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>
>> I think I found two possible bugs when dealing with Automatic note
>> splitting.
>>
>> 1) when a note has an accidental and it has to be split, the ligaturas look
>> out of place.
>>
>> 2) when a note has an accidental (regular accidental, or forced accidental
>> with an !, or even due to *dodecaphonic style*) and it has to be split,
>> these accidentals appear in all repeated notes.
>
>
>> So are these bugs or am I misusing the rhythm splitting?
>
> Bugs. Regressions. In 2.16.0, everything looks fine except for the
> repeated forced accidentals (those have always been overlooked, I
> guess).
>
> Bug squad, can you file the original report and the examples? And can
> people who have some version of 2.17 installed narrow this in some more?
> I don't really fancy bisecting all the way from 2.16.
Huh. git log -p lily/completion-note-heads-engraver.cc turns up the
following as the first non-trivial suspect:
commit 49e8c80e3282cefff91ad1b5aaff5d91b443ba5e
Author: Benkő Pál <address@hidden>
Date: Sat Apr 14 10:21:02 2012 +0200
Issue 2470: introduce completionUnit
enable Completion_heads_engraver to work in sub-bar units
Except that this commit definitely is already included in 2.16.0. So it
must be something else that interferes here. Interesting.
--
David Kastrup