[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: my favorite bug :-)
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: my favorite bug :-) |
Date: |
Fri, 01 May 2015 17:00:27 +0200 (CEST) |
Hello David and Masamichi!
>> I've meant using option `-c' of the compiler.
>
> Uh, removing the actual end product of a command would be sort of
> strange, wouldn't it?
Yes. But sometimes there are Makefile rules that remove intermediate
files.
>> BTW, if you specify option `-o', does gcc create an intermediate
>> file `gega.o' that overwrites another file `gega.o' in the
>> compilation directory?
>
> address@hidden:/tmp$ touch gega.o
> address@hidden:/tmp$ gcc -o gega gega.c
> address@hidden:/tmp$ ls -l gega.o
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 dak dak 0 May 1 16:46 gega.o
>
> No. It is a safe bet that there _are_ intermediate files, but
> they'll likely end up somewhere on /tmp or similar.
Thanks for confirmation. The suggestion is to let lilypond do the
same.
Werner
- Re: my favorite bug :-), Martin Tarenskeen, 2015/05/01
- Re: my favorite bug :-), Martin Tarenskeen, 2015/05/01
- Re: my favorite bug :-), Werner LEMBERG, 2015/05/01
- Re: my favorite bug :-), D'Arcy J.M. Cain, 2015/05/01
- Re: my favorite bug :-), Werner LEMBERG, 2015/05/01
- Re: my favorite bug :-), David Kastrup, 2015/05/01
- Re: my favorite bug :-), Werner LEMBERG, 2015/05/01
- Re: my favorite bug :-), David Kastrup, 2015/05/01
- Re: my favorite bug :-),
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: my favorite bug :-), David Kastrup, 2015/05/01
- Re: my favorite bug :-), Masamichi HOSODA, 2015/05/01
Re: my favorite bug :-), Masamichi HOSODA, 2015/05/01