Re: New issue: Add StaffAxis context type

[tisimst]

On 8/26/2015 4:45 PM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:
> tisimst <[hidden email] 
> </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=180230&i=0>> writes:
> > - CompositeStaff
> > - HybridStaff
> > - StaffBlend
> > - AssortedStaff
> >
> > Maybe "StaffAxis" is the best one.
>
> Of those?  Probably.  Not that it's all that good.  I like OneStaff
> better.

I think I'll put my vote is in for that, too, unless a more descriptive 
one comes up. I think that's what I feel is missing, more description in 
the name to make it more obvious to a new user. "StaffContainer"?

> > Is the purpose just to fix the vertical alignment issue?
>
> Uh, it's not a bug workaround.  It's a feature.  It's sole purpose is to
> use common Y coordinates for all contained staves.  There are a number
> of uses for that, for both parallel and immediately successive contexts.

Poor word choice on my part. I didn't mean to suggest it was a bug. I'm 
pretty sure I understand what it does for successive contexts, but I'm 
not sure what it does for parallel ones. Can you show an example?

Thanks,
Abraham




--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/New-issue-Add-StaffAxis-context-type-tp180204p180231.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.