[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Allura at SF is ready
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: Allura at SF is ready |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Aug 2015 15:00:59 +0100 |
James, you wrote Sunday, August 30, 2015 1:47 PM
> Some comments if I may be so bold.
Of course - most welcome!
> 1. I think it would be useful to have 'Searches' (defined on that left
> hand side panel) for each of the Patch states
>
> New
> Review
> Countdown
> Push
Presumably you'd like these restricted to status:Started? Otherwise you'll see
lots of status:Verified, Abandoned, etc. Anyway, that's what I've done -
easily changed though.
These are the four Patch( ... ) searches.
Open(Patch) now shows all the Started issues with a non-zero patch field.
Useful for finding issues with incorrectly set fields. As a dev you can fix
these. It also includes the needs_work, abandoned, and waiting patch states.
> The 'Fixed' search
This shows all the patches waiting to be Verified. Useful for the bug squad.
> 2. It seems that the 'Needs' field is mandatory and this is going to be
> misleading I think. For example if you look at the new issue I entered
> manually:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4576/
>
> This has a 'Needs: design' tag which is inappropriate (and incorrect).
I've defined " " as the default for this field; should be OK for new issues
now. That also reminded me to define defaults for other fields too.
> Otherwise it seems simple enough.
Thanks!
Trevor
- Allura at SF is ready, Trevor Daniels, 2015/08/28
- Re: Allura at SF is ready, James, 2015/08/30
- Re: Allura at SF is ready,
Trevor Daniels <=
- Re: Allura at SF is ready, James, 2015/08/30
- Re: Allura at SF is ready, Trevor Daniels, 2015/08/30
- Re: Allura at SF is ready, James Lowe, 2015/08/31
- Re: Allura at SF is ready, Trevor Daniels, 2015/08/31
- Re: Allura at SF is ready, Colin Campbell, 2015/08/31
- Re: Allura at SF is ready, Trevor Daniels, 2015/08/31