Re: inconsistent handling of articulations with slurs

[Simon Albrecht]

Here’s a more descriptive example.
Yours, Simon

Am 31.08.2015 um 12:55 schrieb Martin Tarenskeen:
> Hi,
>
> Try to compile the following example:
>
> %%%%
>
> \version "2.19.25"
>
> \relative {
>   d''-.( d-. d-. d-.)
>   d-_( d-_ d-_ d-_)
>   d--( d-- d-- d--)
>   d-^( d-^ d-^ d-^)
>   d-+( d-+ d-+ d-+)
>   d-!( d-! d-! d-!)
>   d->( d-> d-> d->)
>   \break
>   \override Slur.outside-staff-priority = #500
>   d-.( d-. d-. d-.)
>   d-_( d-_ d-_ d-_)
>   d--( d-- d-- d--)
>   d-^( d-^ d-^ d-^)
>   d-+( d-+ d-+ d-+)
>   d-!( d-! d-! d-!)
>   d->( d-> d-> d->)
> }
>
> %%%%
>
> Why are the articulations in bars 2, 7, 9, 14 treated differently? It 
> seems they are aligned with the slurs instead of the notes. Should I 
> forward this to bug-lilypond?
>
> See also attachment for additional strangeness.
>
> --
>
> MT
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

slurs-and-articulation.ly
Description: Text Data

slurs-and-articulation.png
Description: PNG image