bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Obscure melisma fail


From: Simon Albrecht
Subject: Re: Obscure melisma fail
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 22:25:19 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0

Am 09.09.2015 um 18:12 schrieb David Kastrup:
Simon Albrecht<address@hidden>  writes:

Hello,

in the following example Lily fails to recognise the melisma iff
– there is a second voice (comment it to test)
– the music is referenced by a variable and not directly inserted in
\score {} (sic!)

%%%%%%%%%%%%
\version "2.19.25"

alto = \relative {
   <<
     { d'2\melisma e4\melismaEnd cis }
     \new Voice { \voiceTwo s1 }
   >>
}

altText = \lyricmode {
   side, sit
}

\score {
   <<
     \new Staff \alto
     \addlyrics \altText
   >>
}

% exactly the same, but without using a variable for the music
\score {
   <<
     \new Staff \relative {
       <<
         { d'2(\melisma e4)\melismaEnd cis }
         \new Voice { \voiceTwo s1 }
       >>
     }
     \addlyrics \altText
   >>
}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Sigh.  It is _not_ exactly the same.  Your inline example uses slurs,
your variable example doesn't.

Sigh (about myself). Sorry for posting a wrong version of the file, but removing the slurs doesn’t change the result in that the inline version recognises the melisma, the variable version doesn’t.
I’ve learned my lesson not to use \addlyrics.

Yours, Simon



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]