[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lyric word alternatives
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: lyric word alternatives |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Jan 2016 09:57:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Dan Eble <address@hidden> writes:
> In issue #2458 (Remove small gaps between lyric syllables), Janek says:
>>
>> I agree that sometimes a hyphen is necessary, "call-ed" being a good example.
>>
>
> In a tight place this could be rendered "callèd” but it shouldn't be
> "call-èd" when there is room for the hyphen.
"callèd" is such a crutch. I've seen it in something like 19th/20th
century editions of poetry, but usually I'd expect singers to know what
to do. I think that even in my Oxford Shakespeare, "called" is the
standard spelling and in case a one-syllable version is needed, they
spell "call'd" explicitly.
And I'm skeptical that Shakespeare even bothered at all in the
autograph.
> It would be nice if there were a way to specify the alternatives and
> let the computer decide which fits better. Alternatives could also be
> useful in cases like "ev-ery" vs. "ev'ry”. — Dan
Well, TeX has "discretionary" nodes for that sort of thing: you spell
out the unbroken version and both broken parts explicitly.
--
David Kastrup