Re: Default font for the web site

[Simon Albrecht]

On 03.03.2016 00:50, David Kastrup wrote:
> Simon Albrecht <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I hope you don’t mind if I keep the poll public.
> >
> > On 03.03.2016 00:29, Ophir Lifshitz wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > In my opinion, a "classical" look should not be used for a site
> > > whose purpose is documentation, but, a font that is very easy to
> > > read.
> > Perhaps one may argue about what kind of fonts is best to read, but
> > certainly Garamond is perfectly well legible?
> I don't think we should specify non-free fonts.  That would make
> LilyPond's web site work better on people having installed non-free
> fonts than on systems which do not.

Neither do I. There’s EB Garamond, which is free, but unfortunately 
lacks a bold series, so it’s likely not an immediate candidate. 
<http://www.georgduffner.at/ebgaramond/index.html> I was just hoping 
that someone might come up with another good, free Garamond that had 
escaped my notice – probably wishful thinking though.

Best, Simon