[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wrong glissando for notes with duration longa
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Wrong glissando for notes with duration longa |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Oct 2017 18:16:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
> 2017-10-03 13:14 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>> Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> in Staff-context glissando is wrongly positioned if between notes with
>>> duration \longa
>>>
>>> \version "2.19.65"
>>> \new Staff { c''\longa \glissando c'' }
>>>
>>> Bug is present for 2.18.2 up to current master.
>>> Worked in 2.16.2
>>
>> Stem for a longa is treated differently I think. It's part of the
>> notehead or something?
>
> Yep, the longa-"Stem" is part of the note-head.
>
> But why did it work back in 2.16.2?
Change from metric-based spacing to skyline-based spacing?
--
David Kastrup
- Wrong glissando for notes with duration longa, Thomas Morley, 2017/10/03
- Re: Wrong glissando for notes with duration longa, David Kastrup, 2017/10/03
- Re: Wrong glissando for notes with duration longa, Thomas Morley, 2017/10/03
- Re: Wrong glissando for notes with duration longa, Thomas Morley, 2017/10/03
- Re: Wrong glissando for notes with duration longa, David Kastrup, 2017/10/03
- Re: Wrong glissando for notes with duration longa, Thomas Morley, 2017/10/03
- Re: Wrong glissando for notes with duration longa, Thomas Morley, 2017/10/04
- Re: Wrong glissando for notes with duration longa, David Kastrup, 2017/10/04
- Re: Wrong glissando for notes with duration longa, Thomas Morley, 2017/10/04
- Re: Wrong glissando for notes with duration longa,
David Kastrup <=