|
From: | Knut Petersen |
Subject: | Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts |
Date: | Wed, 27 Jun 2018 16:05:35 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 |
Would you show us the GUB's whole lilypond-doc log file? If you preserve the 2.19.81 (Jan. 2018) lilypond-doc log file, I'd like to compare the 2.19.82 log file (broken PDFs) and the 2.19.81 log file (correct PDFs).Zipped versions of both log files are attached. Hope this helps.
To me both logs prove that building of e.g. the english notation.pdf succeeded and that the survival of the original pdf generated by xetex is impossible. Unfortunately reality proves something different. As gub does not run here: It would be nice to know the exact commands gub executes to build lilypond and its documentation. Knut
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |