[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \parenthesize is not affected by \tweak
From: |
Pierre Perol-Schneider |
Subject: |
Re: \parenthesize is not affected by \tweak |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jan 2019 21:07:21 +0100 |
What I mean is that the manual does not says "music object".
What I mean is that "\tweak color #red \parenthesize c' " has the same
output than "\parenthesize \tweak color #red c'" -- weired to me.
What I mean is that in "c'-\tweak color #red -1", #1 is not a musical
object according to my eyes, it is a music function setting the fingering
property on the music
object.
So, another basic question: is there any technical limit so that \tweak
could be applied to \parenthesized ?
Le mar. 29 janv. 2019 à 20:33, David Kastrup <address@hidden> a écrit :
> Pierre Perol-Schneider <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> Le mar. 29 janv. 2019 à 17:57, David Kastrup <address@hidden> a écrit:
> >>
> >>> Pierre Perol-Schneider <address@hidden> writes:
> >>>
> >>> > Hi Bug Squad,
> >>> >
> >>> > %% Snippet:
> >>> > \version "2.19.82"
> >>> > {
> >>> > \tweak color #red \parenthesize c'
> >>> > %vs:
> >>> > \tweak ParenthesesItem.color #red \parenthesize c'
> >>> > }
> >>> > %%
> >>>
> >>> So? The color also does not affect Stem, LedgerLine or Flag by
> >>> default. Why should it affect the parentheses?
> >>
> >
> > So? Basically the manual says: " The \tweak command applies to the music
> > object that immediately follows value in the music stream."
> > Considering your answer, do you mean that " \tweak color #red
> \parenthesize"
> > does not follow the value?
>
> It doesn't. It precedes the value which is c' .
>
> > Do you mean that parenthizes are no object?
>
> The music object is the c' . It is parenthesized, sure. But it also is
> stemmed. The parenthesization is not a music object of its own, it is a
> music function setting the parenthesize property on the following music
> object. Which results in the following music object additionally
> creating a ParenthesizeItem (or whatever it was called).
>
> > I've already asked myself about that before sending the bug report.
> > Your answer does not make any clarification, sorry.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
>