[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond 2.23.0 crashes on layout
From: |
Jonas Hahnfeld |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond 2.23.0 crashes on layout |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Feb 2021 18:16:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.38.4 |
Am Mittwoch, dem 17.02.2021 um 00:00 +0100 schrieb Arusekk:
> W dniu 16.02.2021 o 18:33, Jonas Hahnfeld pisze:
> > Usual disclaimer that LilyPond doesn't fully support Guile 2.2 (yet),
> > so you'll definitely see worse performance (mostly slower startup) and
> > might run into occasional issues, like this one. Guile 1.8 should be
> > the safer choice for now (if you still have it in Gentoo).
> I tried to track back the moment the issue was introduced, but then
> found out that guile 2.x has been supported for two versions only, so I
> stopped digging. Good to know.
> > That said, I've seen this issue before during my tests with Guile 2.2
> > (Translators being collected while still referenced somewhere), but
> > never had a stack trace to investigate. So it's already great to have
> > that, but do I read this correctly that you can reliably reproduce the
> > issue on your system? I'm asking because I can't on mine (Arch Linux)
> > and in fact, your file works just fine for me. So finding out how to
> > trigger this kind of bugs more reliably would be a huge step.
> On my box lilypond crashes every single time I command it to produce
> PDFs (never does if not told to lay out), so I think I can provide much
> help, maybe core files, or recorded execution from GDB (never tried to
> do it before, though).
Okay, that's good for testing the fix (even though I've managed to
reproduce the report from ASan).
> > Regarding AddressSanitizer, did you just compile LilyPond with it or
> > all dependencies? I didn't attempt so far because I thought it wouldn't
> > work, but maybe I should try?
>
> I just set CFLAGS='-fsanitize=address -g' and
> LDFLAGS='-fsanitize=address' before configuring lilypond, and installed
> the debug symbols for guile, so that AddressSanitizer could resolve
> function names from it. ASAN wiki suggests to mainly compile executables
> with it, because it does not support sanitized libraries used with not
> sanitized executables (or it does, but requires preloading it manually).
Ok, makes sense. I guess I confused it with MemorySanitizer then.
> But maybe sanitizing some library too would help additionally? I could
> try it if you want, but sanitizing guile might break[1] (I have not
> tried). Gentoo gives extreme flexibility as to managing compile-time
> options, while handling the burden of building everything one thing at a
> time, so this does not pose any problem for me (I don't recommend
> setting up a Gentoo VM just for tests, unless you are patient, since
> building lilypond and deps from a base system takes at least an hour).
It's not needed right now, I think I understand the problem at hand,
see https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6100 Maybe my plan
for fixing it works, let's see 😉️
Jonas
> > (It could of course be an issue in one of the libraries, especially the
> > stack trace in Pango looks odd, but it's equally possible that it's a
> > heap corruption bug that may show in the least expected places...)
>
> (These heap bugs are the worst...)
>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part