[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: poor m4 hash performance

From: Ben Pfaff
Subject: Re: poor m4 hash performance
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2006 16:53:34 -0700
User-agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)

Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:

> According to Ben Pfaff on 6/4/2006 4:15 PM:
>> Is there a good reason why m4 should not use a hash table that
>> grows dynamically?  It is easier to deal with software that can
>> figure out parameters on its own rather than having to be told.
> CVS head m4 does dynamically grow its hashtables; the problem is that
> backporting it to the 1.4 branch is not trivial, and at this point, the
> 1.4 branch is in non-invasive bug fix mode only.  [...]

My mistake.  I should not have jumped into the middle of the
thread without reading more of the context.
"In the PARTIES partition there is a small section called the BEER.
 Prior to turning control over to the PARTIES partition,
 the BIOS must measure the BEER area into PCR[5]."
--TCPA PC Specific Implementation Specification

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]