[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Updating FreeBSD port
From: |
Mikhail Teterin |
Subject: |
Re: Updating FreeBSD port |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Sep 2006 08:57:11 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
On Thursday 21 September 2006 08:51, Eric Blake wrote:
= Sorry, but GNU coding standards require that GNU programs use long
= options, and that is already something that POSIX-specified getopt()
= cannot do.
That's alright -- the BSD getopt_long implementation can.
= Instead, gnulib makes it very easy, with getopt_long(), to meet both GNU
= coding standards and to attempt to provide a superset of POSIX semantics
When using the short options, please, stick to the POSIX-provided semantics.
Finally, does m4 actually use/document the short-options usage, that's
affected by the POSIX vs. GNU differences in getopt()?
-mi
- Re: Updating FreeBSD port, (continued)
- Re: Updating FreeBSD port, Paul Eggert, 2006/09/20
- Re: Updating FreeBSD port, Mikhail Teterin, 2006/09/20
- Re: Updating FreeBSD port, Paul Eggert, 2006/09/20
- Re: Updating FreeBSD port, Mikhail Teterin, 2006/09/20
- Re: Updating FreeBSD port, Paul Eggert, 2006/09/20
- Re: Updating FreeBSD port, Eric Blake, 2006/09/20
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Updating FreeBSD port, Bruno Haible, 2006/09/21
- Re: Updating FreeBSD port, Eric Blake, 2006/09/21
- Re: Updating FreeBSD port, Mikhail Teterin, 2006/09/21
- Re: Updating FreeBSD port, Eric Blake, 2006/09/21
- Re: Updating FreeBSD port,
Mikhail Teterin <=
- Re: Updating FreeBSD port, Eric Blake, 2006/09/21
- non-POSIX getopt() (Re: Updating FreeBSD port), Mikhail Teterin, 2006/09/21
- Re: non-POSIX getopt() (Re: Updating FreeBSD port), Paul Eggert, 2006/09/21
- Re: Updating FreeBSD port, Mikhail Teterin, 2006/09/21
- Re: Updating FreeBSD port, Eric Blake, 2006/09/21
- Re: Updating FreeBSD port, Mikhail Teterin, 2006/09/21
Re: Updating FreeBSD port, Eric Blake, 2006/09/20
Re: Updating FreeBSD port, Eric Blake, 2006/09/21