bug-m4
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: generating testsuite in bootstrap?


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: generating testsuite in bootstrap?
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:00:37 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

According to Ralf Wildenhues on 2/13/2008 3:36 PM:
| Hello,
|
| is it worthwhile to generate m4/tests/testsuite from within bootstrap,
| so that then,
|   ./configure && make all install
|
| does not need the autotools?

Sounds like a good argument to me - allowing you to run bootstrap on a git
checkout on a full-fledged machine, then copy the directory structure over
to a punier machine to see how things fare.  However, looking at history:

http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=m4.git;a=commitdiff;h=be70d90

there was a point in time where half of the testsuite was generated at
bootstrap (but not the part that required autom4te).  So this would be a
change in the opposite direction.  I'm also worried about timestamps; one
of the tests makes sure __m4_version__ outputs the same thing as what
configure.ac uses, and I still haven't gotten git-version-gen working
nicely with m4.  I'll play with the idea some, but it's too early to tell
whether I'll commit a patch along these lines.  Fortunately, 'make dist'
makes sure the testsuite is up-to-date, so a snapshot tarball does not
need autotools to be tested.

- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!

Eric Blake             address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHs5K184KuGfSFAYARAhXyAJ0Zgc5DGiuDy8PPv8+0QvtAvSbxNgCgpUCe
BoyhyojOVH5gI8fmbfuHr+M=
=OjNo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]