[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [m4-1.4.11] build feedback
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: [m4-1.4.11] build feedback |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Apr 2008 06:15:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Hi Eric,
Eric Blake wrote:
> The failures are all in gnulib portability code,
> and don't appear to immediately impact m4 behavior (the gnulib
> replacements are more general than what m4 uses them for). Meanwhile, can
> you please rerun with 'make -k' to get the full set of failures?
You would not need to write this stereotypic reply if the main tests were
run before the gnulib ones:
--- Makefile.am.bak 2008-04-02 05:48:32.000000000 +0200
+++ Makefile.am 2008-04-04 06:12:39.000000000 +0200
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
##
## Written by Gary V. Vaughan <address@hidden>
-SUBDIRS = . examples lib src doc tests checks
+SUBDIRS = . examples lib src doc checks tests
EXTRA_DIST = bootstrap c-boxes.el cfg.mk maint.mk \
.version m4/gnulib-cache.m4
DISTCLEANFILES = stamp-h
Bruno
- [m4-1.4.11] build feedback, Nelson H. F. Beebe, 2008/04/03
- Re: [m4-1.4.11] build feedback, Eric Blake, 2008/04/03
- Re: [m4-1.4.11] build feedback,
Bruno Haible <=
- fseek failure output [was: [m4-1.4.11] build feedback], Eric Blake, 2008/04/04
- Re: [m4-1.4.11] build feedback, Bruno Haible, 2008/04/12
- Re: [m4-1.4.11] build feedback, Tom G. Christensen, 2008/04/13
- Re: [m4-1.4.11] build feedback, Bruno Haible, 2008/04/13
- Re: [m4-1.4.11] build feedback, Tom G. Christensen, 2008/04/13
- Re: [m4-1.4.11] build feedback, Bruno Haible, 2008/04/13
- Re: [m4-1.4.11] build feedback, Tom G. Christensen, 2008/04/13
- Re: [m4-1.4.11] build feedback, Bruno Haible, 2008/04/13
- Re: [m4-1.4.11] build feedback, Tom G. Christensen, 2008/04/14